The relationship between shear strength of Douglas-fir glued-laminated timber beams and shear span-to-depth ratio (a/d) is not satisfactorily explained either by presence of compressive stresses perpendicular to grain, or by “two- beam” action. When a shear failure in dry Douglas-fir is free to seek its plane of greatest weakness–as is usually the case in glued-laminated beams–its shear strength was not found to increase significantly with application of compressive stress perpendicular to grain. At the same time, finite-element stress analyses of unchecked Douglas-fir glued laminated beams showed shear stress distributions for most of the a/d domain in question about the same as those predicted by ordinary mechanics, with no indication of “two-beam” action. Shear strength of dry Douglas-fir, no matter how it is deter mined, appears to be related to “sheared area” As. As is the product of the beam width and shear span. It is suggested that the a/d effect is actually just one manifestation of this over all size effect. Since “two-beam” action does not appear to apply to Douglas-fir glued-laminated timber beams, consider ation should be given to modifying design codes to reflect this. In fact, assuming “two-beam” action in conjuction with large As values may lead to unsafe situations, while members with low As values may be designed too conservatively.
You must be logged in to download any documents. Please login (login accounts are free) or learn how to Become a Member